aws-cloudfront-modify-function-code
A principal with cloudfront:UpdateFunction and cloudfront:PublishFunction can modify CloudFront Functions code. While CloudFront Functions cannot call AWS APIs (no IAM escalation), modified code can forge trusted headers to origins, enabling application-layer bypass attacks.
match
A conjunctive graph pattern. Variables (?x) bind node ids; every clause must hold.
where
ServerlessFunction
?function.provider_type == 'AWS::CloudFront::Function'
effective_action_on(?principal, ?function) contains 'cloudfront:UpdateFunction'
effective_action_on(?principal, ?function) contains 'cloudfront:PublishFunction'
emit
| source type | Identity |
|---|---|
| target type | Compute |
| source | ?principal |
| target | ?function |
| permissions | cloudfront:UpdateFunction cloudfront:PublishFunction |
| conditions | iam_permission scp_or_org_policy |
| state logic | ACTIVE when both cloudfront:UpdateFunction and cloudfront:PublishFunction are present (publishing requires both permissions). BLOCKED if an SCP or permission boundary denies either action. |
Narrative
{principal.name} can call cloudfront:UpdateFunction and cloudfront:PublishFunction on CloudFront Function {target.name}. Modified code can manipulate request headers/URLs to origins. If the origin trusts CloudFront-injected headers for access control, modified code can forge those headers to bypass authentication (application-layer attack, not cloud-native IAM escalation). CloudFront Functions cannot call AWS APIs and have no execution role.
Raw rule rules/derived/aws/cloudfront.yaml
id: aws-cloudfront-modify-function-code
emits: CanModifyCode
description: A principal with cloudfront:UpdateFunction and cloudfront:PublishFunction can modify CloudFront
Functions code. While CloudFront Functions cannot call AWS APIs (no IAM escalation), modified code can
forge trusted headers to origins, enabling application-layer bypass attacks.
applies_to:
- aws
match:
- - principal: null
- HasPermission
- function: null
where:
- node_type(?function) == ServerlessFunction
- ?function.provider_type == 'AWS::CloudFront::Function'
- effective_action_on(?principal, ?function) contains 'cloudfront:UpdateFunction'
- effective_action_on(?principal, ?function) contains 'cloudfront:PublishFunction'
emit:
source_type: Identity
target_type: Compute
source: ?principal
target: ?function
permissions:
- cloudfront:UpdateFunction
- cloudfront:PublishFunction
conditions:
- iam_permission
- scp_or_org_policy
state_logic: ACTIVE when both cloudfront:UpdateFunction and cloudfront:PublishFunction are present (publishing
requires both permissions). BLOCKED if an SCP or permission boundary denies either action.
confidence: 0.6
derived_from:
- ?principal HasPermission ?function (cloudfront:UpdateFunction + cloudfront:PublishFunction)
false_positive_note: "CloudFront Functions are distinct from Lambda@Edge. CloudFront Functions have\
\ NO IAM execution role and cannot call AWS APIs \u2014 there is NO CanExecuteAs escalation chain.\
\ The attack surface is application-layer: modified code can read/modify request headers and URLs,\
\ potentially forging headers the origin uses for access control (e.g., X-Custom-Auth bypass). This\
\ is a CanModifyCode edge (code manipulation) not an execution-as-role capability. Confidence is 0.6\
\ (application-layer impact, not cloud-native IAM privilege escalation). Lambda@Edge code modification\
\ is modeled separately in lambda.yaml (lambda:UpdateFunctionCode -> CanModifyCode), and Lambda@Edge's\
\ execution role IS an escalation target (CanExecuteAs via messaging-chains)."
narrative: '{principal.name} can call cloudfront:UpdateFunction and cloudfront:PublishFunction on CloudFront
Function {target.name}. Modified code can manipulate request headers/URLs to origins. If the origin
trusts CloudFront-injected headers for access control, modified code can forge those headers to bypass
authentication (application-layer attack, not cloud-native IAM escalation). CloudFront Functions cannot
call AWS APIs and have no execution role.'